Deontay Wilder Claims Tyson Fury Risks Diabetes After Tasting His Blood During Their Fight

The heavyweight boxing rivalry between Deontay Wilder and Tyson Fury has taken another bizarre turn. Wilder recently made a shocking claim, stating that Fury could be at risk of developing diabetes after allegedly tasting Wilder’s blood during their infamous rematch.

The Controversial Moment

The incident occurred during their second bout in February 2020, where Tyson Fury defeated Wilder via technical knockout to claim the WBC heavyweight title. A striking moment from the fight, which has since become iconic, was Fury seemingly licking blood off Wilder’s neck in the heat of battle.

Wilder has now revisited this moment, suggesting that Fury’s actions may have dire health consequences. In a recent interview, Wilder said:
“What Tyson Fury did was disgusting. Nobody knows what kind of health risks that brings. He doesn’t know my medical history, and tasting my blood could expose him to something dangerous, even diabetes.”

Health Risks and the Reaction

While Wilder’s claims about diabetes have no scientific backing in this context, his remarks have sparked widespread debate among fans and medical professionals. Wilder emphasized that Fury’s actions were not only unsportsmanlike but also reckless, given the potential health implications of exchanging bodily fluids during a fight.

Many in the boxing community view Wilder’s comments as an attempt to keep their rivalry alive, but others have criticized Fury’s behavior as unnecessary showmanship.

The Heated Rivalry

The rivalry between Wilder and Fury is one of the most intense in boxing history. Their trilogy fight series was marked by drama inside and outside the ring, with both fighters taking shots at each other in the media.

Fury’s dominant victory in their rematch solidified his status as one of the greatest heavyweights of the modern era, while Wilder has struggled to reclaim his footing after back-to-back losses. However, Wilder has continued to highlight incidents like the “blood-licking” moment as evidence of Fury’s controversial tactics.

The Science Behind Wilder’s Claims

Wilder’s assertion that Fury could contract diabetes from tasting his blood has been met with skepticism. According to medical experts, diabetes is not a contagious condition and cannot be transmitted through blood or saliva.

However, there are legitimate health risks associated with exposure to blood, such as the potential transmission of infections like hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV, although these risks are mitigated if neither party has an underlying condition. Wilder’s claims, while dramatic, may be rooted in his belief that Fury’s actions crossed a line of decency and safety in the sport.

Fury’s Response

So far, Tyson Fury has not directly addressed Wilder’s latest comments. Fury, known for his brash and unapologetic demeanor, is likely to dismiss the claims as another attempt to discredit his victories. Fury has previously said that the blood-licking gesture was a symbolic display of dominance, intended to intimidate his opponent and show his fearlessness.

What’s Next for Wilder and Fury?

Both fighters have moved on to other challenges in the ring, but their rivalry continues to captivate fans. Fury is preparing for his highly anticipated rematch with Oleksandr Usyk on December 21, while Wilder is seeking to rebuild his career after a recent loss to Zhilei Zhang.

Despite their separate paths, Wilder’s latest remarks suggest that the bad blood between the two remains unresolved.

Public Reaction

The boxing world is divided over Wilder’s comments. Some fans support his criticism of Fury’s actions, calling for stricter regulations to prevent unsportsmanlike conduct in future bouts. Others view Wilder’s claims as an exaggeration, designed to stay relevant and keep the spotlight on their rivalry.

Deontay Wilder’s assertion that Tyson Fury risks diabetes from tasting his blood has reignited their infamous rivalry, adding another layer of drama to their already storied history. While the medical accuracy of Wilder’s claims is questionable, the incident itself remains one of the most talked-about moments in boxing.

As both fighters continue their respective careers, their ongoing feud ensures that their legacy in the sport will be forever intertwined. Whether Wilder’s latest comments lead to another confrontation or fade into the background remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the heavyweight division is never short on intrigue when these two names are involved.